The checks.
- Every state
- Some states
- No reading yet
The checks below read 90+ government datasets. That figure is the 112 datasets wired into live consumption, less the 16 that are region-scoped to our overseas layers and cannot fire on an Australian address, leaving 96 — then rounded down, so the published claim is always weaker than the evidence. The dataset census was counted August 2026.
13 more of the 35 checks are not grouped here; all 35 are in the table below.
Evidence with every report: The map · Every source named · What to investigate next
What stands behind it.
This is what KRAYN holds, not what a report shows. These figures are not steps in one total and should never be added together.
90+
government datasets
counted August 2026
120M+
records held
measured 2026-09-03
780K+
Victorian planning applications
All located; 784,480 decided, across 81 planning schemes. This is what KRAYN holds, not what a report shows.
not held beyond 2022-12-23 statewide: the publisher's statewide return holds no later application (checked 2026-09-17); one council's own register runs to 2026-09-04 (21,705 applications)
measured 2026-09-14
620K+
ACT, NSW, QLD and SA development applications
Held from ACT, NSW, QLD and SA sources: this is what KRAYN holds, not what a report shows. Coverage is stated, not implied to be national.
Reports show nearby planning applications in New South Wales and Victoria.
held as at 2026-09-03
37M+
official NSW land valuations
The Valuer General’s determined values — 14 annual base dates from 2012, and 85% of parcels carry every one. New South Wales only; not implied to be national.
held as at 2026-09-03
850K+
NSW complying-development, construction and occupation certificates
The fast-track approval, construction and occupation record. Certifier outcomes are shown where determined — 74% carry one. New South Wales only; not implied to be national.
held as at 2026-09-03
All 35, state by state.
- Produced a reading
- No reading yet
As at 1 October 2026 · measured across 271 reports with a resolved jurisdiction, from 296 generated · 25 could not be placed in a state and are counted in neither direction
| Check | NSW43 reports | VIC195 reports | QLD13 reports | SA9 reports | WA5 reports | TAS2 reports | NT1 report | ACT3 reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flood | ||||||||
| Planning zone | ||||||||
| Planning overlays | ||||||||
| Coastal acid sulfate soil | ||||||||
| Landfill register (EPA VLR) | ||||||||
| Wetland mapping | ||||||||
| Biodiversity mapping | ||||||||
| Coastal management area | ||||||||
| Mine subsidence district | ||||||||
| Land protection mapping | ||||||||
| Slope / terrain | ||||||||
| Route & road network | ||||||||
| Parcel dimensions | ||||||||
| Lot orientation | ||||||||
| Minimum lot size | ||||||||
| Contamination | ||||||||
| Groundwater bores | ||||||||
| Surface geology | ||||||||
| Landslip (mass movement) | ||||||||
| Bushfire | ||||||||
| Wind region (AS/NZS 1170.2) | ||||||||
| Ground / geotech | ||||||||
| Registered easement / mains | ||||||||
| Mapped watercourse | ||||||||
| Heritage register | ||||||||
| Native title | ||||||||
| Land reservations / corridors | ||||||||
| Transmission lines | ||||||||
| Load limits & clearances | ||||||||
| Future land use (PSP) | ||||||||
| Growth-area contribution (GAIC) | ||||||||
| Melbourne Strategic Assessment | ||||||||
| Soil & geology | ||||||||
| Climate & rainfall | ||||||||
| Airport safeguarding |
- A green dot means the check has produced a reading on at least one stored report in that state. A check that could not be read counts as missing, not as covered.
- It depends on how many reports there are: a state with few reports can show fewer readings. It is not a promise for any one address — your report names what ran for yours.
- A jurisdiction with no reports is not a jurisdiction we have refused. Where no report has been generated we have no evidence in either direction and say so, rather than writing an absence we cannot support.
- This is a photograph. It is as at 1 October 2026 and it does not update itself. Every figure is reproducible on demand by re-running the deriver that wrote it.
Where a check stops.
Who owns it. Not where to dig.
For the precise location, depth and dig-safety detail of any service, contact Before You Dig Australia (BYDA) or the relevant provider directly before you dig or build. KRAYN identifies what's there and who owns it; BYDA and the providers hold the detailed locate information.
A “no match” is never a clearance, on any of these lanes.
These registers are incomplete — the landfill register doesn't capture every historical or unregistered tip — and the wetland and acid-sulfate layers are area-scale. The 1788 (pre-European) wetland extent is a deduced historical reconstruction, not a present-day ground test; where it flags, it's a prompt for a geotechnical investigation, not a determination.
See them on real reports: a Patterson Lakes home on mapped prospective acid sulfate soil and former swampland and a Springvale property about 33 m from a registered closed landfill.
Regional context, never a site test.
Broad-scale, regional mapping — context, not a parcel-level soil test, and it never moves the verdict.
Every report names exactly which checks ran for your address, and which didn't.
The absence of a flagged finding is not a clean bill of health.
What the public record says about value and consent
Two lanes read the record around your parcel rather than the ground under it — and both are stated with the jurisdiction they actually cover.
Official land values — the NSW Valuer General's determined value for the land, every year from 2012, shown as the record states it. 14 annual base dates to July 2025 (held as at 2026-09-03), joined to your parcel on lot and plan. It is the determination as published — not an estimate, and not a market appraisal of the property.
The street's consent record — what a report lists near your boundary, stated only for the jurisdictions where the section appears — not implied to be national. New South Wales: applications and complying development certificates within 200 m, counted again at 500 m and 1 km, with certifier outcomes where determined, and the largest nearby subdivision flagged. Certificates are counted because much low-rise work never appears as a development application at all. Victoria: located planning applications within 200 m, each with its determination as the register records it. Applications without a mapped location are not shown, so the list is not a complete count.
How we test ourselves
The platform is tested as carefully as the property.
These test KRAYN's own software and the reports it has produced.
285
automated tests run on our deploy path. Any one of them can stop it.
as at 2026-10-18
What they will not let a report say:
REFUSED"Largely clear — a few things to check"
on a report whose own checks found a major issue.
The verdict is raised to meet the worst finding.
See these checks run on a real site.
Free preview first, no account.