Hazards & constraints
Contamination registersVIC · ACT · NT · TAS
Flood overlays
Bushfire BPA + BAL
Planning zone + overlays
Landfill & waste facilitiesVIC register + national
Coastal acid sulfate soilVIC · NSW coastal
What we check
Every check, named, and where it runs.
More than twenty checks across six areas, each cited in your report. Here's the full list, with an honest map of which run Australia-wide versus which depend on your state.
Land & title
Heritage register
Native title
Reserved corridors / public acquisition
Transmission & utility corridors
Registered easements
Utility mains (sewer / water, where published)
Airport height (OLS + ANEF)
Site conditions
Bedrock geology
Soil profile
Terrain slope
Climate & rainfall normals
Seismic hazard
Road & heavy-vehicle access
Bridge mass-limit routing
Excavation difficulty
Concrete-pour window
Former wetland / swamp (1788 + current)
Future land use
Precinct structure plans / planned land use
Construction activity (nearby DAs)
DA base rates
Land & soil resource
Broad-scale, regional mapping — context, not a parcel-level soil test, and it never moves the verdict.
Land & soil capabilityregional class — NSW LSC, VIC land systems (WA, SA where covered)
Salinityregional salinity rating + risk
Groundwater / aquiferthe regional aquifer system (BoM) — never site groundwater
Soil hazardswater + wind erosion, acidity, water-storage, ease of excavation
Evidence with every report
The mapparcel-centred satellite + measured boundary
Every source nameda sources-reviewed receipt
What to investigate nexta site-specific due-diligence roadmap
Beyond the checks
Not just the data. What it works out for you.
The checks above are the facts. From them, the report reads the site — what shapes development, and what typically adds to cost and why. Each is shown on a real sample.
What the report works out
What shapes development herezone, statutory purpose, lot & overlays (VIC and NSW)
What typically adds to build cost, and whyfactors to budget for — never a dollar figure
Coverage varies by state
Some checks run everywhere. Others depend on your state.
We won't pretend coverage is uniform. National datasets run for any Australian address; the statutory-planning layers are deepest in Victoria and thinner elsewhere. Every report names which ran for your address.
Australia-wide
National datasets. These run for any AU address.
- Bedrock geology
- Soil profile
- Terrain slope
- Climate & rainfall
- Road network & access
- Native title
- Transmission corridors
- Seismic
- Bridges & mass limits
Varies by state · Victoria deepest
Statutory + state-register layers. Depth depends on the state.
- Planning zone & overlays (VIC deepest, NSW partial)
- Contamination (VIC / ACT / NT / TAS)
- Bushfire
- Flood
- Heritage
- Airport height
- Reserved corridors
- Future land use (PSP)
- Land & soil resource (NSW / VIC; WA / SA where covered)
- Vegetation clearing (QLD)
- Registered easements (VIC / NSW / QLD, where published)
- Utility mains — sewer / water (Melbourne Water; where published)
- Landfill & waste facilities (VIC register + national)
- Coastal acid sulfate soil (VIC + NSW coastal)
- Former wetland / swamp mapping (VIC)
Registered easements & utility mains — identified
KRAYN shows the indicative location of registered easements and sewer / water mains crossing a parcel, identifies the authority or provider that owns them, and flags the build-over consent they imply — read directly from the authorities.
Exact location & depth — confirm before you dig
For the precise location, depth and dig-safety detail of any service, contact Before You Dig Australia (BYDA) or the relevant provider directly before you dig or build. KRAYN identifies what's there and who owns it; BYDA and the providers hold the detailed locate information.
Former swamp, landfill & acid sulfate soil
In Victoria, KRAYN checks your parcel against the EPA Victorian Landfill Register, the state Coastal Acid Sulfate Soils mapping, and the Victorian Wetland Inventory — current and 1788 (pre-European) extent. These registers are incomplete: the landfill register doesn't capture every historical or unregistered tip, and the wetland and acid-sulfate layers are area-scale — so a “no match” is never a clearance. The 1788 (pre-European) wetland extent is a deduced historical reconstruction, not a present-day ground test; where it flags, it's a prompt for a geotechnical investigation, not a determination. The EPA Victorian Landfill Register and former-wetland lanes run for Victorian addresses today, and — across every Australian state and territory — a national waste-facility context lane (the Geoscience Australia National Waste Management Facilities Database, CC BY 4.0) checks your parcel's surroundings for nearby landfill and waste facilities as proximity context: it is never authoritative, and a “no match” is never a clearance. The coastal acid sulfate soil lane also runs in New South Wales — against the NSW acid sulfate soil planning maps and the NSW ASS risk mapping, for coastal and tidal-river-valley parcels (inland NSW returns an honest no-coverage, never a clearance). See them on real reports: a Patterson Lakes home on mapped prospective acid sulfate soil and former swampland, a Springvale property on a registered closed landfill, and a Booragul home in New South Wales on mapped Class 1 coastal acid sulfate soil.
How we keep it honest
Every report names exactly which checks ran for your address, and which didn't. The absence of a flagged finding is not a clean bill of health. Coverage varies by state (Victoria is deepest); we tell you what applied to your specific site, and what to verify with the relevant authority.