25 checks. How sure we are on each.
Not hit-or-clear. The spread is the point.
Numbers, not scores.
The arithmetic
- Measured
- 697 m²
- 400 m² × 2 required
- − 800 m²
- Short
- 103 m²
Against Clause 4.1, Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010. You see which figure to argue with.
What the neighbours applied for
- 200 m13
- 500 m279
- 1 km449
Largest: a 299-lot subdivision, 405 m away (lodged 2024).
As at 2026-08-10. © State of New South Wales (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure). Source: NSW Planning Portal Online DA Data API.
Land values, as recorded
These are the Valuer General’s determined land values for this property on each base date shown. They are the record only — not a market valuation, not an estimate, and not advice.
NSW Valuer General — Bulk Land Values · CC BY 4.0
The honest edges
Where we stop.
2 gaps on this address. Neither counted as clear.
Flood
Coverage gap · not a clearWe couldn’t confirm flood mapping for this parcel — no flood control is mapped here, but NSW flood mapping is published council by council, so that can mean either no flood hazard or mapping this council hasn’t submitted. That’s a gap in our coverage, not a clear result; check with the local council or floodplain authority if flood risk matters for your plans.
NSW DCCEEW EPI
Future land use (PSP)
NOT AVAILABLE HEREoutside integrated coverage — not a clearance
No layer for this parcel. Its absence isn’t read as “nothing planned”.
Figures rebuilt 2026-09-15.
KRAYN-2026-d994f6b94935bb81
Now read yours.
One address · 6 plans · every source named.